EXPLOITED VULNERABILITIES

CISA Puts Three Linux Kernel Flaws on KEV, Federal Agencies Get Two Days to Patch

CISA added three actively exploited Linux kernel vulnerabilities to the KEV catalog on September 19, 2026, with a federal patch deadline of September 21.

Matt Lucas  |  September 20, 2026  |  5 min
Editorial hero illustration
CVEs in this postCVE-2025-39682CVE-2025-39964CVE-2026-53266CVE-2026-68121CVE-2026-74469CVE-2026-80844CVE-2026-81000Live detections →All RedEye CVEs →
3
kernel CVEs added to KEV
9.8
highest CVSS of the set
2 days
FCEB remediation window
7
kernel LPE bugs disclosed this week
TL;DR
  • What: CISA added CVE-2025-39682, CVE-2026-53266, and CVE-2025-39964 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on September 19, 2026, citing evidence of active exploitation.
  • Impact: All three are local attacks against core kernel subsystems, and the ebtables bug (CVE-2026-53266, CVSS 8.8) is an out of bounds write that can escalate a local account to root on any Linux host where an attacker already has a shell.
  • Fix / mitigation: Apply your distribution's current kernel update and reboot, because the source does not name a single upstream fix version and the patched build number comes from your vendor advisory (Red Hat updated all three advisories on September 19, 2026 at 2:00 a.m. UTC).

CISA added three Linux kernel vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Friday, September 19, 2026, and gave federal civilian agencies until September 21 to fix them. That is a two day window, and it is the shortest signal CISA has available. Red Hat updated the advisories for all three flaws the same day at 2:00 a.m. UTC to acknowledge active exploitation, with the line: "This CVE is high risk and there are known public exploits leveraging this vulnerability. Address this vulnerability with high priority."

The three CVEs

Three different subsystems, three different bug classes, one shared precondition: the attacker already has local access.

The 9.8 on CVE-2025-39682 deserves a note. That score sits in the range most teams reserve for unauthenticated remote code execution, but the described impact is memory disclosure and denial of service from a local authenticated user. Score the ebtables out of bounds write above it in your own triage. An 8.8 that ends in root on the box is worth more attention than a 9.8 that ends in a leak, and CVSS will not make that call for you.

The deadline is September 21, not next quarter

BOD 26-04, Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk, sets the remediation date at September 21, 2026 for Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies. If you are not FCEB, the date still tells you what CISA thinks of the exploitation evidence. Two days is not a routine KEV entry.

What we know about exploitation, and what we do not

There are currently no public details on how the three vulnerabilities are being exploited in the wild. No threat actor attribution, no campaign name, no indicators of compromise, no confirmation that the three are being used together as a single chain. CISA cited evidence of active exploitation and Red Hat confirmed public exploit code exists, and that is the full extent of the record right now.

That gap matters for how you respond. You cannot hunt for an IOC list that does not exist. You can patch, and you can hunt for the behavior each bug class produces, which is covered in the detection guidance at the end of this post. Treat any writeup that gives you a confident attacker profile for these three CVEs today as speculation.

Local does not mean low

Every one of these requires local access, and that reliably causes teams to downgrade them. The reasoning is that if an attacker already has a shell, the game is over. It is not. The gap between an unprivileged web application user and root is the gap between a contained incident and a rebuilt host, and it is the gap between one container and the node underneath it.

Multi-tenant infrastructure is where this hurts most. Shared hosting, CI runners that execute untrusted pull request code, Kubernetes nodes running workloads from multiple teams, and any VDI or jump host with interactive user sessions all hand an attacker the local access precondition by design. A kernel privilege escalation on a CI runner means the build secrets for every project on that runner. On a container host, it means every other tenant on the node.

CVE-2025-39964 has a second order effect worth naming. Corrupting the results of cryptographic operations is not just a crash. AF_ALG exposes the kernel crypto API to userspace, and applications that route hashing or encryption through it can be pushed into producing wrong output without failing loudly. Integrity checks that silently return the wrong answer are worse than integrity checks that error.

Four more kernel LPE bugs landed the same week

Separately from the KEV additions, researcher Asim Manizada disclosed four local privilege escalation flaws in the Linux kernel: CVE-2026-80844 (DirtyAH6), CVE-2026-81000 (TUNderflow), CVE-2026-68121 (PPPoEject), and CVE-2026-74469 (DiagSpill). These are not on the KEV catalog and are not confirmed as exploited in the wild. They do bring the week's total to seven kernel local privilege escalation issues with public detail attached, which changes the arithmetic on kernel patch cadence. If your fleet reboots for kernel updates on a quarterly schedule, this week is the argument for changing that.

What to do now

Live patching is a partial answer

kpatch and livepatch can close some of these without a reboot, but coverage varies by vendor and by CVE, and not every kernel bug is live patchable. Verify per CVE against your vendor's live patch manifest before you treat a host as fixed, and schedule the reboot anyway.

Fast triage

uname -srvm
lsmod | grep -E 'algif|^tls|ebtable'
journalctl -k --since "7 days ago" | grep -icE 'general protection fault|BUG: |Oops'

The last command counts kernel oops and general protection fault entries from the past week. Exploitation attempts against memory corruption bugs like CVE-2026-53266 frequently fail before they succeed, and a host with a nonzero count that used to sit at zero is worth a closer look before you reboot it and lose the ring buffer.

Questions about your exposure?

RedEye Security provides assessments for organizations that need to understand their real risk.

Talk to us